Put it to work.
Run a model trained for your task. Capture the outcomes, corrections, and difficult cases that matter.
A model trained for your task. Use it in the real world, learn from feedback, and repeat with a better version.
Use–Learn–Repeat
Run your task model and capture the corrections and outcomes that matter.
Your work changes. Your model should keep up. Use–Learn–Repeat connects real-world work with reviewed feedback and model improvements, so each cycle can return a better version to production.
Run a model trained for your task. Capture the outcomes, corrections, and difficult cases that matter.
Review feedback, curate useful examples, and fine-tune a candidate. Evaluate it against your current model on held-out tasks.
Release the improved model into your workflow. Use the next cycle to find the next improvement.
During peak hours, your computers serve your workload. When demand falls, spare capacity trains the next model. The same compute, moving through Use–Learn–Repeat.
Peak demand puts the fleet to work serving requests. Training yields capacity to your production workload.
Illustrative capacity schedule, not live utilization. Actual allocation depends on demand and hardware compatibility. Training uses spare capacity; candidate models are evaluated before release.
More training is only useful if the model gets better at your task. Compare each candidate with your current model before moving it into production.
Set the evaluation criteria together: task accuracy, response quality, latency, and inference cost.
The strongest fit: a high-volume task, a clear definition of good output, and feedback you can turn into examples.
Learn from agent edits, corrected routing, and reviewed replies as your product and customer needs evolve.
Turn corrected extractions and human reviews into training examples for your specific document types.
Build a model around a core product task, then use reviewed user feedback to inform each new version.
Keep the economics of a specialized model, with an ongoing path to improve it. Scope your task, quality bar, and running cost together before training begins.
Explore a 1/10th inference-cost scenario.
Following the Typedesk approach: prepay for inference, with initial model development included. Agree on the learning cadence, ongoing training scope, and delivery terms before getting started.
Use–Learn–Repeat: use the model, learn from reviewed feedback through fine-tuning and evaluation, then repeat with an improved version. Learning happens in model updates; the model does not change its weights during every request.
The cadence depends on your workload, the volume of useful feedback, and the evaluation required. We scope the shortest practical cycle for your task rather than promise a fixed turnaround for every model.
Representative inputs, examples of good outputs, and a way to review real-world results. Data handling, permissions, and which production examples may be used for training are agreed before work begins.
The loop is built around selected, reviewed examples. Usage provides a source of possible learning signals; useful feedback is curated before it becomes training data.
Evaluate the candidate and current model on the same held-out tasks using agreed criteria. Release decisions should account for regressions as well as improvements.
Pereno builds on Typedesk AI’s task-specific model approach, with continuous learning at the center: Use–Learn–Repeat.
Start with one task worth getting better at.